Trephine
AboutSpecialtiesPricingLoading...

Copyright © 2024 Trephine. All rights reserved. The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.

TREPHINE

Terms Of UsePrivacy Policy

Regional anesthesia and pain medicineComparative Study

06 May 2025

Fluoroscopy-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of the lumbar medial branch nerves: dose escalation study and comparison with radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model.

Background

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a common method for alleviating chronic back pain by targeting and ablating of facet joint sensory nerves. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging, non-invasive, image-guided technology capable of providing thermal tissue ablation. While HIFU shows promise as a potentially superior option for ablating sensory nerves, its efficacy needs validation and comparison with existing methods.

Methods

Nine adult pigs underwent fluoroscopy-guided HIFU ablation of eight lumbar medial branch nerves, with varying acoustic energy levels: 1000 (N=3), 1500 (N=3), or 2000 (N=3) joules (J). An additional three animals underwent standard RFA (two 90 s long lesions at 80°C) of the same eight nerves. Following 2 days of neurobehavioral observation, all 12 animals were sacrificed. The targeted tissue was excised and subjected to macropathology and micropathology, with a primary focus on the medial branch nerves.

Results

The percentage of ablated nerves with HIFU was 71%, 86%, and 96% for 1000 J, 1500 J, and 2000 J, respectively. In contrast, RFA achieved a 50% ablation rate. No significant adverse events occurred during the procedure or follow-up period.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that HIFU may be more effective than RFA in inducing thermal necrosis of the nerve.

CommentIn

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Apr 10;50(4):321-323. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105515.

COI Statement

Competing interests: AH and RA are the founders of FUSMobile and hold ordinary options in the company. J-FA is a member of FUSMobile’s scientific advisory board and holds ordinary options in the company. SL and EM hold shares and ordinary options in the company. SM holds ordinary options in the company. MG holds ordinary options in the company and is a consultant to the company. TT has no interests to declare.

Article info

Journal issue:

  • Volume: 50
  • Issue: 5

Doi:

10.1136/rapm-2024-105417

More resources:

HighWire

Full Text Sources

Paid

Share: